Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | TBİ-23-176 | ApplIcatIons of Response Surface Methodology In TIssue Culture Research | Elective | 1 | 2 | 6 |
|
Level of Course Unit |
Second Cycle |
Objectives of the Course |
The objectives of this course are:
• to teach the basics of Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
• to teach how to use RSM in tissue culture research
|
Name of Lecturer(s) |
Doç.Dr.Melekşen AKIN |
Learning Outcomes |
1 | The students will
• learn the basics of RSM
• learn how to apply RSM in tissue culture studies
• learn how to generate RSM designs and analyze the data with RSM |
|
Mode of Delivery |
Daytime Class |
Prerequisites and co-requisities |
None |
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
|
Course Contents |
Application of Response Surface Methodology in Tissue Culture Research |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
1 | • Introduction to Response Surface Methods (RSM) | | | 2 | • Factorial designs | | | 3 | • Central Composite Design | | | 4 | • Central Composite Design | | | 5 | • Box-Behnken Design | | | 6 | • Evaluating multiple responses | | | 7 | • Evaluating multiple responses | | | 8 | • Recap of the topics | | | 9 | • Computer generated optimal design | | | 10 | • Computer generated optimal design, data analyses and interpretation with RSM | | | 11 | • Computer generated optimal design, data analyses and interpretation with RSM | | | 12 | • Applying RSM to mixture design | | | 13 | • Applying RSM to mixture design | | | 14 | • Recap of the topics | | |
|
Recommended or Required Reading |
Akin, M., Eyduran, E., & Reed, B. M. (2016). Use of RSM and CHAID data mining algorithm for predicting mineral nutrition of hazelnut. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 128(2), 303-316.
Anderson, M. J., & Whitcomb, P. J. (2005). RSM simplified: optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments. New York, NY: Productivity Press.
Niedz, R. P., & Evens, T. J. (2016). Design of experiments (DOE)—history, concepts, and relevance to in vitro culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 52(6), 547–562.
|
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | | Work Placement(s) | |
|
Workload Calculation |
|
Midterm Examination | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Final Examination | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Report Preparation | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Project Preparation | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Reading | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Oral Examination | 1 | 30 | 30 |
|
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
|
* Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|
Iğdır University, Iğdır / TURKEY • Tel (pbx): +90 476
226 13 14 • e-mail: info@igdir.edu.tr
|