| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | BMBG-113 | SEPARATION METHODS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY | Elective | 1 | 1 | 6 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| Second Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| Clarifying the importance of separation methods in chemical analysis. |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Servet AŞKIN |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | 1-Being able to comprehend the basic concepts and features of separation techniques
2- Being able to understand the importance of separation techniques.
3- Being able to know the chromatographic separation techniques and comprehend the applications area .
4- Being able to select suitable separation techniques for interference problem
5- Being able to compare of the used techniques according to advantages and disadvantages
6- Being able to make a group or individual studies |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Daytime Class |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
| not |
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
| research |
| Course Contents |
| Importance of separation methods, nature of the separation process, recovery and separation factor, classification of chemical separation methods.
Separation based on selective precipitation. Separation based on selective volatilizations.
Extraction, theoretical treatment of and instrumentation for solvent extraction. Counter current distribution as a historical method. Solid phase extraction (SPE). Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)
Chromatography: basic principles of a chromatographic separation, classification of chromatographic methods, types of chromatographic development. |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | Importance of separation methods, nature of the separation process, recovery and separation factor, classification of chemical separation methods. | NO | NO |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| -Christian, . G. D., (2000).Analytical Chemistry
-Harris,D.C,(1980) Analytical Chemistry
-Skoog, D. A, Holler,H. J.,Nieman, T. A. (1998)Principles of InstrumentalAnalysis
-Cazes, J., Scott, R.P.W.,(2002) Chromatography Theory, Marcel Dekker, |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 80 | | Seminar | 1 | 20 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 50 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 50 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | Turkish | | Work Placement(s) | | No |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 3 | 10 | 30 |
| Final Examination | 3 | 10 | 30 |
| Seminar | 8 | 15 | 120 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|
|
|
Iğdır University, Iğdır / TURKEY • Tel (pbx): +90 476
226 13 14 • e-mail: info@igdir.edu.tr
|