Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | FDB-23-138 | DİN FELSEFESİNİN TEMEL PROBLEMLERİ | Elective | 1 | 3 | 6 |
|
Level of Course Unit |
Second Cycle |
Objectives of the Course |
The aim of the course is to expose main problems in philosophy of religion to analyse concepts pf religion and god to show clear differenece between philosphy of religion and theology and to consider arguments for and against to existence of god. |
Name of Lecturer(s) |
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Fatih Özkan |
Learning Outcomes |
1 | To acquire a clear conscious about diferences between religion and philosophy, theology and philosohy | 2 | To be able to consider basic dogmas of reveled theology philosophically and to get an critical attitude | 3 | To investigate arguments for exsitence of god analitically and critically | 4 | To investigate arguments for atheism analitically and critically |
|
Mode of Delivery |
Daytime Class |
Prerequisites and co-requisities |
None |
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
None |
Course Contents |
Concepts of religion and god, relatioship between religion and philosohy, relationship between theology and philosophy, natural theology and reveled theolgy, theism, deism and atheism. Clasical arguments for existence of god and their crirtics |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
1 | Philosophy of religion and its main problems | Discussion | | 2 | Analysing concept of religion and informations about religions | Discussion - Seminar | | 3 | Analysing conceptes of god and sacred | Discussion | | 4 | Various ideas of god | Discussion - Seminar | | 5 | Clasical arguments for existence of god: a general evaluation | Discussion | | 6 | The arguments for existence of god: Cosmological argument and its critics | Discussion - Seminar | | 7 | The arguments for existence of god: Teleogical argument and its critics | Discussion | | 8 | The arguments for existence of god: Ontolgical argument and its critics | Discussion - Seminar | | 9 | Relationship between relgion and ethics: a general evaluation | Discussion | | 10 | The argument from ethics: Kant I | Discussion - Seminar | | 11 | The argument from ethics: Kant II | Discussion | | 12 | Relatioship between god and ethics in contemporary philsophy | Discussion - Seminar | | 13 | Relationship between religion and science in contemporary philosphy | Discussion | | 14 | The Problem of Evil | Discussion - Seminar | | 15 | Overview-Discussion | Discussion | |
|
Recommended or Required Reading |
The Main Sources:
1. Mehmet Aydın, Din Felsefesi, İzmir ilahiyat Fak・tesi Vakfı Yay., İzmir
2. Ed. Michael Peterson, Akıl ve İnanç, Çev.:Rahim Acar Küre Yay. İstanbul 2006.
3. Cafer Sadık Yaran, Din Felsefesine Giriş, Rağbet Yay., İstanbul 2010.
Secondary Sources:
1. Mehmet Bayraktar, Din Felsefesine Giris, Fecr Yayınları, Ankara, 1997
2. Paul Tillich, Din Felsefesi, Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 2000
3. Etienne Gilson, Tanrı ve Felsefe, Birlesik yayıncılık, İstanbul, 1999
4. Necip Taylan, Düşünce Tarihinde Tanrı Sorunu, Ayısığı yay., İst, 1998
5. Turan Koç, Din Dili, (1. baskı: Rey Yayıncılık, 2. baskı: İz yayıncılık)
|
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 50 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 50 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | Work Placement(s) | None |
|
Workload Calculation |
|
Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Attending Lectures | 15 | 3 | 45 |
Seminar | 1 | 8 | 8 |
Criticising Paper | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Self Study | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Reading | 10 | 11 | 110 |
|
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
|
* Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|
Iğdır University, Iğdır / TURKEY • Tel (pbx): +90 476
226 13 14 • e-mail: info@igdir.edu.tr
|